Ever wondered why the politicians who are not preferred and are corrupt are more likely to be win an election ?
Lets read it now .
So the trick lies in understanding how the system works .
First of all , any kind of politician whether an honest one , who thinks in favour of the people or a corrupt one who is more interested in filling his pockets from the money of people or public money , it would take both long time as making any change in the system is not an easy task its a lengthy time consuming process . So for a long time a common man or rather a poor man gets nothing in return after giving his precious vote to anyone , one has to understand this fact and there is no by pass to making quick change in the system , it takes time to bring a change that is permanent .
So a corrupt one understands the same and promises to make changes quicker and earlier to lure people and attract more affected people towards him seeking relief or change and also uses some of his smart way's to get votes or rather purchase votes .
Lets take an example there are 100 educated people and nearly 200 uneducated , jobless and homeless people , now out of the 100 educated one's most of the people would be busy in their schedules and would not pay much attention to polling their vote and would pay more attention to discussions .
Whereas the number of people who are in need of jobs , shelter or food is double plus more number of people out of this 200 people would be interested to vote .
Reason is very simple the politician understands the "chain of politics" . So if a person who is hardly able to make 3 meals a day would obviously prefer instant benefits provided by the candidate who has stood up for election , benefits could be like for person working for food would be provided with money or food to sustain for a week or so .
A businessman would be provided would favorable trade policies and contracts .
The jobless would be promised jobs.
The one with a job provided with increments .
So lured by the instant benefits and all type of people turn into a compromise of selecting this candidate more over the one who would make changes but would have to struggle long before he fullfills his promise .
So the clever candidate wins and the chain of corruption continues , this candidate exploits public resources and money , scandals and scams come up in his name and then he leaves and again comes the elections and chain continues .
So if we really want a politician who should bring change we should choose an educated candidate over an uneducated and dominant candidate .
Rather than discussions everyone should poll their votes , one can always take the instant benefits and still vote the person they find adequate enough !
By : Anmol Lakhanpal
0 comments:
Post a Comment